Glad to see how much this one resonated… I made another big sheet yesterday covering the major math + physics breakthroughs made by people under 30 over the last 3,000 years, listing only the top 5-10 per century (field, explanation, location, etc). And then I had a bunch of essays written on the observations and patterns across the dataset.
I’m fully convinced that AI is just a better search engine. Like way better. But it does not think. It does not reason. It is not intelligent. It searches over and generates predictions over its training data — this is not the same as thought.
JJ (@JosephJacks_)
Quantum mechanics turns 100 this year. I put the whole history on one sheet — 72 entries, 1900 to 2025.
Planck kicks it off in 1900. The core of the theory gets built in about 18 months across 1925-26: matrix mechanics, then wave mechanics, then the proof they’re the same theory, then Born’s probability rule and uncertainty….After that it stops being a single field. It splits into QED, condensed matter, particle physics, and quantum information — four separate bodies of work coming off one root.
I colored the rows by branch so you can actually see those tracks running at the same time instead of flattening them into one line.
Every row is just the year, the people, what they did, and why it mattered.
It runs all the way to where things stand now: error-corrected qubits and a 2025 Nobel for quantum tunneling in a single circuit. A century of physics you can scan in a couple of minutes.
— https://nitter.net/JosephJacks_/status/2067772727977754917#m