ArXiv

RECALL: Recovery Experience Collection for Active Lifelong Learning in Vision-Language-Action Models

Authors
Ulas Berk Karli, Tesca Fitzgerald
Categories
cs.RO, cs.AI, cs.LG
arXiv
https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.23617v1
PDF
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.23617v1

Brief

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models face inefficiencies when fine-tuned via passive imitation learning. Karli and Fitzgerald propose an active, uncertainty-guided continual learning pipeline that collects targeted recovery demonstrations: this improves adaptation efficiency but, when used alone, causes catastrophic forgetting. The paper empirically evaluates replay-based data mixing and elastic weight consolidation, revealing tradeoffs between plasticity and retention for autoregressive VLA policies. Full text not available; summary based on the abstract.

Why it matters

Active, uncertainty-guided recovery demonstration collection improves fine-tuning efficiency for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models compared with passive imitation learning (Karli & Fitzgerald; arXiv 2026-06-22).

Key details

  • Fine-tuning only on actively-collected recovery data induces catastrophic forgetting; the authors evaluate replay-based data mixing and elastic weight consolidation (EWC) and report tradeoffs between plasticity to new recovery data and retention of prior behaviors in autoregressive VLAs.
Source evidence

Abstract

Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are commonly fine-tuned through passive imitation learning, where additional demonstrations are collected for tasks where the policy performs poorly. This approach incurs several downsides: it requires the robot to fail before data collection is triggered, provides little guidance about which states require supervision, and wastes demonstrator effort on redundant parts of the task where the policy already performs well. In this paper, we propose an active, continual learning paradigm for VLAs. We demonstrate that active, uncertainty-guided data collection leads to more efficient fine-tuning than when using passively-collected demonstrations. However, we also find that fine-tuning only on actively-collected recovery data leads to catastrophic forgetting. We evaluate techniques for continual learning, including replay-based data mixing and elastic weight consolidation, and identify tradeoffs between plasticity to uncertainty-guided recovery data and retention of previously learned behaviors. Overall, our work contributes an empirical study of active continual learning for autoregressive VLAs, establishing that uncertainty-guided recovery demonstrations can improve adaptation efficiency while also revealing open challenges when targeted new data is incorporated into large robot policies.