Twitter/X

The post claims the real value is in the 43 edits that were deleted immediately…

2026-06-25 · 16:54 UTC ·@ginacostag_ ·0 min read

Brief

@ginacostag_ argues the final deck hides value: 43 edits deleted immediately after publication show judgment lives in the diff between drafts rather than the polished output. Quoting Kunal Tangri, she says three decades of 'capture your institutional knowledge' reduced knowledge to searchable documents and discarded judgment; @saranormous named this the untrainable territory and @farsight_ai is building a 'System of Judgment.'

Why it matters

The post claims the real value is in the 43 edits that were deleted immediately after release; the author insists judgment resides in the diff between the first draft and the final deck, not in the polished output.

Key details

  • Kunal Tangri is quoted saying 30 years of 'capture your institutional knowledge' meant indexing and search, which strips judgment; @saranormous labeled the resulting gap the 'untrainable territory,' and @farsight_ai says it is building an instrument called the System of Judgment to live inside it.
Source evidence

The final deck is not where the value is.

The value is in the 43 edits that got deleted right after.

The judgment is in the diff.

Kunal Tangri (@TangriKunal)

"Capture your institutional knowledge" has meant the same thing for 30 years: index the documents, search over them.

But a document is the output of judgment with the judgment removed.

The judgment is in the diff. The markup between the first draft and the one that ships. And almost every firm throws it away.

@saranormous named the untrainable territory. At @farsight_ai we're building the instrument that lives inside it.

The System of Judgment.

— https://nitter.net/TangriKunal/status/2070175722878996592#m