Twitter/X

On 2026-06-28 @kimmonismus flagged claims that “a new model from Zhipu AI” is at…

2026-06-28 · 09:23 UTC ·@kimmonismus ·1 min read

Brief

Kimmonismus (2026-06-28) challenges claims that “a new model from Zhipu AI” matches Fable5 on cybersecurity, finding only a Wall Street Journal piece about GLM-5.2. WSJ says GLM-5.2 can match top U.S. models in some bug-finding tasks, and 360 Security claims Tulongfeng rivals Anthropic’s Mythos, suggesting either underestimated GLM-5.2 or misleading reporting.

Why it matters

On 2026-06-28 @kimmonismus flagged claims that “a new model from Zhipu AI” is at least as strong as Fable5 for cybersecurity, but their search found only a Wall Street Journal article naming GLM-5.2 as a recently released model.

Key details

  • The WSJ reports GLM-5.2 can match top U.S. models in some bug-finding scenarios; separately, China’s 360 Security says its Tulongfeng tool is comparable to Anthropic’s Mythos (Claude Mythos).
  • The author concludes either GLM-5.2 is stronger than commonly believed or circulating reports are conflating/overstating different models (i.e., misleading coverage).
Source evidence

Supposedly, "a new model from" from zAI is said to be at least as strong as Fable5 in cybersecurity-related aspects.

I did some research and only came across a Wall Street Journal article, which, however, does not refer to a new model, but to GLM 5.2 as a relatively new model that was released recently. So either GLM 5.2 is stronger than people think, or the news being circulated is misleading.

According to WSJ, Zhipu AI’s GLM-5.2 can match top US models in some bug-finding scenarios, and China’s 360 Security says its new Tulongfeng tool is comparable to Anthropic’s Mythos.

Polymarket (@Polymarket)

JUST IN: A new Chinese AI model from Zhipu AI reportedly matches Claude Mythos’ performance at finding security bugs.

— https://nitter.net/Polymarket/status/2071039148484378891#m