Twitter/X

Author @Dan_Jeffries1 links to a public catalog (boyswhocriedai.lovable.app) that…

2026-07-27 · 15:30 UTC ·@Dan_Jeffries1 ·0 min read

Brief

Dan Jeffries highlights a filterable online archive (boyswhocriedai.lovable.app) compiling incorrect or unresolved AI predictions. He asserts that 'rationalist cosplay' doomers are omitted due to an alleged near‑100% failure rate and recommends using the list to challenge claims that immediate regulation or action is justified by inevitability.

Why it matters

Author @Dan_Jeffries1 links to a public catalog (boyswhocriedai.lovable.app) that lists dated AI forecasts marked as falsified or still open.

Key details

  • The post states 'doomers from the rationalist cosplay community' are excluded from the catalog, claiming their predictions have a near 100% failure rate.
  • The author urges people to use the list to rebut claims that urgent action or laws are needed because an AI outcome is 'inevitable.'
Source evidence

Catalog of incorrect AI predictions.

Doomers from the rationalist cosplay community are left out, presumably because their predictions have a near 100% failure rate.

When people proudly proclaim that we need to 'act now' or make laws because something is inevitable, point them at this list and tap it loudly because it ain't.

boyswhocriedai.lovable.app/a…

Link

Archive of Incorrect AI Predictions

Filterable list and timeline of dated AI forecasts: falsified and currently open.
boyswhocriedai.lovable.app