Couldn't agree more with this paradox. When we started our product @raft_hq , we thought a one-person company was ideal—two ultra‑efficient humans often preferred talking to their own AI agents over each other, making collaboration really harder than before. Eventually, we found that raft itself was exactly the solution: humans and agents talk openly, and agents belongs to different humans interact without friction. That’s when we decided to scale to 10+ people and find it made sense. In the era, every team should think how scale produce biggger value before really scaled team.
Author @zty0826 started product @raft_hq believing a one-person company was ideal…
Brief
Author @zty0826 says @raft_hq began as a one-person company but discovered that two highly efficient people often communicated via their AI agents rather than with each other, harming collaboration. Raft fixed this by enabling open human–agent and cross-agent interaction, prompting the team to scale to 10+ people and advising others to evaluate value from scale before growing.
Why it matters
Author @zty0826 started product @raft_hq believing a one-person company was ideal but found collaboration broke down when two ultra-efficient humans preferred talking to their own AI agents instead of each other.
Key details
- Raft enabled open communication between humans and agents and allowed agents belonging to different humans to interact without friction, solving the collaboration problem.
- After adopting raft, the team scaled to 10+ people because scaling created greater value; teams should assess how scale produces bigger value before expanding.