Article
Evals ≠ tests
While building Braintrust I’ve been thinking about what evals are good at, what they should be used for, and how they differ from other parts of the software development lifecycle, like tests.
Though
Author @ankrgyl (writing on 2026-08-04) argues that "Evals ≠ tests," asserting…
Brief
Author @ankrgyl, while building Braintrust, argues that evals are not the same as software tests and should be treated differently within the development lifecycle. The post (published 2026-08-04) emphasizes thinking through what evals are good at, what they should be used for, and how they differ from unit, integration, or other testing practices.
Why it matters
Author @ankrgyl (writing on 2026-08-04) argues that "Evals ≠ tests," asserting evals have different strengths and roles than traditional software tests.
Key details
- The piece was written while the author was building Braintrust and reflects on how evals should be used and how they differ from other parts of the software development lifecycle (like unit/integration tests).