Asset confiscator @gabriel_zucman claims our essay in @nytimes contains a "shocking logical mistake": we observe that billionaires don’t believe it’s the one-shot deal he was peddling, but then we don’t credit the state for permanent wealth tax revenues. The problem? Only an enacted tax raises money. If he wants to tell voters that a recurring wealth tax on those who stay is the only way to offset lost income tax revenues from those gone, then I invite him to go ahead and say so. 1/5
Gabriel Zucman (@gabriel_zucman)
If the tax becomes annual, it would also generate revenue every year by virtue of, you know, being annual.
So have Rauh and Jaros taken this into account?
No.
They assume billionaires would leave as if the tax were annual…
... But that it would generate revenue only once!
— https://nitter.net/gabriel_zucman/status/2073905636430184854#m