Twitter/X

John Loeber claims Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas opposes Affirmative…

Brief

John Loeber argues Justice Clarence Thomas's opposition to affirmative action stems from fear that exceptional benefits would make others view his achievements as token. He warns the Jason Arday scandal—alleged plagiarism, fabricated interviews and years of silencing critics with racism accusations—will cheapen minority scholars' achievements and foster a harmful stereotype, so people must be judged solely on merit.

Why it matters

John Loeber claims Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas opposes Affirmative Action because any exceptional benefit would make others question whether Thomas earned his seat on merit or was a token.

Key details

  • Loeber argues the Jason Arday scandal—alleged plagiarism, fabricated interviews, and years of bullying critics with accusations of racism—will cheapen achievements of honest disadvantaged scholars and create a new explicitly racist stereotype.
  • Kevin A. Bryan (@Afinetheorem) reports inspecting multiple of Arday's papers and finding 'pretty obvious fraud,' including claims of interviews that could not have happened.
Source evidence

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has long opposed Affirmative Action, on the basis that any exceptional benefit would cheapen his own achievements, and cause others to question if he is there by merit, or as a token.

The Jason Arday story is terrible for minorities: if someone can be a total fraud, plagiarizing everything, lying to everyone, but get away with it for years by bullying critics with accusations of racism... then how many other Jason Ardays are there? Of course people will ask this.

This cheapens the achievements of honest, deserving men and women from disadvantaged backgrounds: maybe others will view their work with suspicion, worry that they're hiring "another Jason Arday", never sure how to weigh their actual achievements against the clearly exceptional benefit of DEI.

Like all acts of injustice, it backfires in the end. People acted willingly unfairly in favor of Jason Arday, elevating his bogus work and turning a blind eye to red flags. The result is a new, explicitly racist stereotype, which will hurt actual deserving scholars.

The lesson is simple: we must treat people fairly, by the merits of their work -- with no plus- or minus-points for surrounding circumstances.

Kevin A. Bryan (@Afinetheorem)

I don't want to pile on to the Cambridge situation, but media coverage saying "plagiarism" are really missing the boat. There is pretty obvious fraud - literally claiming he did interviews that couldn't have happened and so on - in like every paper of his that I looked at. 1/4

— https://nitter.net/Afinetheorem/status/2084666949955387634#m