Twitter/X

Author @LoganTGott (posted 2026-08-05) says LinkedIn is “a mess”

2026-08-05 · 14:15 UTC ·@LoganTGott ·1 min read

Brief

LoganTGott (post dated 2026-08-05) says LinkedIn is cluttered with AI-generated and recycled posts, but that low quality creates opportunity: spending 30–45 minutes/day to post authentically and follow content-funnel practices can drive results—he claims founders added $250k+ in pipeline in a month and one now gets posts quoted on sales calls.

Why it matters

Author @LoganTGott (posted 2026-08-05) says LinkedIn is “a mess”: he spends 30–45 minutes/day on the platform and sees mostly AI-generated content and repeated takes.

Key details

  • Low content bar: sounding like a real person, demonstrating subject expertise, and using content funnels can produce immediate ROI—he reports founders adding $250k+ in pipeline in one month and one founder now has their posts quoted on sales calls.
  • Success is not an algorithm hack in his account: it came from consistently showing up and posting human voice while others copy-pasted ChatGPT; platform quality is poor but it’s an easy place to win if you try.
Source evidence

Honestly LinkedIn is kind of a mess most of the time.

I'm on here like 30-45 minutes a day and it's mostly AI slop and the same few takes getting reposted over and over.

It gets old fast.

But that's kind of why it works right now?

The bar is so low that if you just sound like an actual person, know what you're talking about, and understand content funnels, you stand out almost immediately.

I've had founders add $250k+ in pipeline in a month from this.

One of them gets their posts quoted back to them on sales calls now.

It's not some algorithm hack, they literally just showed up and talked like a human while everyone else was copy pasting ChatGPT into the void.

Platform kinda sucks, yes... but it's also never been easier to win on if you actually try...