Twitter/X

On 2026-08-06 @iruletheworldmo called the reported result an “impressive score”…

2026-08-06 · 09:16 UTC ·@iruletheworldmo ·0 min read

Brief

Author @iruletheworldmo (2026-08-06) says two things: the new result is an impressive score but demonstrates ARC AGI 3 is saturated. They insist comparisons are unfair because ARC forbids harnesses and the claim is only on the easier test set, argue this is ARC’s problem, and note Ilya’s model outperforms it without a harness.

Why it matters

On 2026-08-06 @iruletheworldmo called the reported result an “impressive score” but said ARC AGI 3 is saturated and effectively fallen.

Key details

  • They argued the comparison is not apples-to-apples because ARC itself doesn’t allow any harness and the reported result is only on ARC’s test set, which the author says is easier — blaming ARC’s evaluation setup.
  • The author claims “Ilya’s model crushes this with no harness,” rejects purity-based dismissal (e.g., discounting medical breakthroughs because a model used a harness), and taunts ASI/singularity chasers.
Source evidence

two things are true here.

this is an impressive score and it’s clear that arc agi 3 is saturated.

this is not apples to apples with other scores you’ve seen because arc themselves don’t allow any type
of harness. also, it’s only on the test set, which is much easier.

this is more a problem with arc imo.

we’re not going to discount a cure for cancer because it a model used a harness or wasn’t a ‘pure llm’, whatever that is.

🍓🍓🍓 (@iruletheworldmo)

arc agi 3 has fallen. btw, ilyas model crushes this with no harness.

happy hunting asi chasers. this is what the singularity feels like. yeeeehaww.

— https://nitter.net/iruletheworldmo/status/2085122893432672501#m