Terry Godier, “ Browsers Have Standards, the App Store Has Judgment ”: A while ago I tried to submit an iOS app for Dark Hours , my
astronomy website for normal people. It was rejected on the
grounds that it was astrology. It has no tarot function, no horoscopes, and nothing that I, or
anyone else I’ve asked, would associate with astrology. I penned a nice little rant two years ago expressing my fury over the way that kooks promoting astrology often try to insinuate that their voodoo pseudoscience is even vaguely related to the hard science of astronomy. And it really is an unfortunate fluke of the English language that two subjects with a contentious relationship are differentiated as words by two letters. Even if you know the difference between the two, and care, if you’re reading quickly your eyes might conflate one word with the other. But if you actually look at Godier’s Dark Hours , for even just a few seconds, it is instantly obvious that it pertains to the science of astronomy and has absolutely nothing — zero, zilch, nada — to do with astrology. So even if Apple’s App Store reviewer misread the submission’s description, and wrongly assumed it was yet another quack astrology app, if they launched it and spent just a few seconds poking around, they should have instantly recognized their incorrect assumption. But that’s not what happened. They rejected the app on the utterly incorrect grounds that it pertained to astrology. If this was an honest mistake from a reasonable judicial board, you’d expect the interaction with Godier, the developer, to have gone something like this: App Review: REJECTED : Astrology. Developer: No, it’s astroNoMy not astroLoGy. App Review: Oh, sorry! Carry on, APPROVED . But that’s not what happened at all. Godier proceeded through a series of escalations up to the App Review Board and the Review Board responded that they determined the original rejection was valid because, I shit you not, “We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature.” Which isn’t even about astrology. It’s straight out of Kafka. Dark Hours is not just merely un related to astrology (let alone tarot-card reading). It’s actually exquisitely well-designed and painstakingly crafted. It’s exactly the sort of app that the App Store ought to celebrate and highlight. It doesn’t just belong in the category of astronomy apps in the App Store, it will raise the quality bar for astronomy apps in the App Store. iOS-exclusive, native Liquid Glass UI, smooth scrolling, beautiful typography and layout, and way more useful as a native mobile app than as a website. Go check out the website and I’m sure you’ll agree that it’s the sort of thing that would be even cooler as an app. But it is an app, and the app is better and more useful than the website version, and Godier has fought to get it approved. But Apple’s App Review Board said no, on fallacious easily-refuted grounds. This isn’t just contrary to the benefit of developers, like Godier. It’s obviously contrary to the benefit of Apple itself, which should not just accept an app like Dark Hours, but celebrate it as an exemplar of the platform. Mistakes happen. But in a functioning system mistakes get corrected, and mistakes as obvious as this one get corrected almost instantly and include a quick apology for the conflation. The App Store is not a functioning system.
★ App Store Rejection of the Week: Dark Hours
Brief
John Gruber's 2026-08-07 Daring Fireball post recounts Terry Godier’s attempt to publish Dark Hours — an astronomy website converted into an iOS‑exclusive native app with a Liquid Glass UI, smooth scrolling, and careful typography — which was rejected by Apple’s App Review as “Astrology.” Godier escalated the case to the App Review Board, which astonishingly upheld the rejection while asserting the app “includes a live tarot reading feature.” Gruber calls the decision Kafkaesque and argues the app is precisely the kind of high‑quality, platform‑native work Apple should celebrate. He notes Godier had previously complained about the public conflation of astronomy and astrology two years earlier, and uses this incident to conclude that the App Store review process fails to correct obvious errors and thus harms both developers and Apple’s own interests.
Why it matters
On 2026-08-07 John Gruber (Daring Fireball) reported that developer Terry Godier had his iOS app Dark Hours — an astronomy site turned native app — rejected by App Store review as “Astrology”; the initial rejection message read: “REJECTED : Astrology.”
Key details
- Godier escalated the rejection up to the App Review Board, which nonetheless upheld the decision and claimed, implausibly, “We understand that the app includes a live tarot reading feature.”
- Dark Hours is iOS‑exclusive and described as a native Liquid Glass UI app with smooth scrolling and refined typography; Gruber argues the app is more useful than the website and would be an exemplar of quality for the platform.
- Gruber uses the episode (and a prior rant by Godier two years earlier about confusion between astronomy and astrology) to argue that the App Store review system is dysfunctional, failing to correct obvious mistakes and harming developers and Apple’s ecosystem.