ArXiv

Challenges in Evaluating Explanation Methods for Static and Evolving Data

Authors
Jerzy Stefanowski
Categories
cs.AI
arXiv
https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06351v1
PDF
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.06351v1

Brief

Jerzy Stefanowski's paper tackles evaluation gaps in XAI by demonstrating issues with the DetoxAI image-recognition system (bias detection, concept unlearning), presenting a human-grounded evaluation example for image-classification explanations, and exploring methods to adapt explanations—notably counterfactuals—to evolving data streams with concept drift. It emphasizes challenges in tracking co-evolution of data, models, and explanations and is a 13-page EASi 2026 workshop preprint.

Why it matters

The paper identifies insufficient evaluation practices in XAI and illustrates the issue using the DetoxAI image-recognition system applied to bias detection and concept unlearning.

Key details

  • It provides a human-grounded evaluation example for explanation methods in image classification and examines adapting explanations to evolving data streams subject to concept drift.
  • The author discusses adapting counterfactual explanations for drifting data and highlights the challenge of tracking the co-evolution of data, models, and explanations; the 13-page preprint was accepted to the EASi 2026 Workshop (IJCAI-ECAI 2026) and posted 2026-08-06.
Cleaned source text

Abstract

Comment: 13 pages, 1 figure = this paper is a preprint of the workshop [Explainable AI in Space] paper for IJCAI ECAI 2026 conference