TWITTER_ARTICLE

A March 12, 2026 post by mattjay summarizes a claim that someone 'hacked…

2026-03-12 · 21:57 UTC ·mattjay ·0 min read

Brief

Mattjay’s short social post recaps an apparent claim of exploiting Perplexity to obtain unlimited Claude Code access, then undercuts it with Perplexity’s response that the behavior was just delayed billing rather than a successful hack. The post nevertheless highlights a potentially important multi-agent AI security pattern, though it offers only anecdotal detail and no substantiated methodology beyond 'one prompt' and 'three shell commands.'

Why it matters

A March 12, 2026 post by mattjay summarizes a claim that someone 'hacked Perplexity Computer' to get 'unlimited Claude Code' using 'one prompt' and 'three shell commands.'

Key details

  • The post says Perplexity denied a true exploit, replying that its billing was simply asynchronous and telling the user to 'check your inbox,' after which the user reportedly found the bill.
  • The author frames the incident as a possible broader multi-agent AI product design issue, suggesting the bug class could affect many deployed systems, but provides no technical proof or detailed reproduction steps in the 72-word post.
Source evidence

title: @mattjay: TL;DR - guy thinks he hacked Perplexity.

Perplexity responds with "lol, no our ...
author: mattjay
contenttype: twitterarticle
published: 2026-03-12T21:57:58+00:00
source_url: https://x.com/mattjay/status/2032461806325629231

word_count: 72

TL;DR - guy thinks he hacked Perplexity.

Perplexity responds with "lol, no our billing is just asyn

TL;DR - guy thinks he hacked Perplexity.

Perplexity responds with "lol, no our billing is just async. check your inbox."

Guy finds his bill: shocked pikachu

I hacked Perplexity Computer and got unlimited Claude Code

One prompt. Three shell commands. I used their own AI to hack itself.
This is a class of bug that probably exists in every multi-agent AI product shipping today. And the fix is a design pattern that...

Posted: 2026-03-12T21:57:58.000Z

Engagement: 7200 likes, 212 retweets, 91 replies