No body text on file.
Open the original to read the full piece.
Midha also emphasized the technical and epistemic contours of progress in AI. He broke the model development pipeline into pretraining, mid‑training, deployment and a continuous verifiable feedback loop; where feedback is objectively verifiable (unit tests, PR approvals, lab measurements like X‑ray diffraction) capabilities improve fastest. He used examples from software engineering and his Periodic Labs materials program to show how verification closes the loop and reduces hallucination. Midha pushed back on the idea that frontier models are already at parity — saying frontiers are multiple (software engineering, consumer chat, video, materials) and that model+‘harness’ co‑design (tools and orchestration layered atop models) is critical to real‑world performance and cost efficiency. He warned executives against naive sandboxing: technical literacy is essential because black‑box deployment leads to misuse (hallucinations, prompt injection) and suboptimal cost/ROI. The hosts agreed the conversation pointed toward commodification at the user level — customers will demand cheap, reliable services — while AMP’s grid aims to deliver that by coordinating capacity, forecasting demand, and resisting speculative financialization of compute.
Anjney Midha (guest, Speaker 5) founded AMP PBC to standardize compute into a fungible “grid” and sell consumption as grid credits; the system is software-only (a BORG-like translation layer) that lets researchers ignore underlying chip types and raises utilization from typical industry levels (<70%) toward ~90–96% (Midha cites lab examples reaching ~95–96%).
Open the original to read the full piece.