Twitter/X

Author @beaverd (2026-06-20) reports GLM 5.2 runs locally for free and “doesn't…

Brief

GLM 5.2, according to @beaverd on 2026-06-20, runs locally at no cost and reliably follows complex, explicit multi-step instructions that the author says Opus could not execute. The post emphasizes GLM 5.2’s lack of apparent refusal behavior (“no sandbagging”) when asked to wire protein behavior into an engine.

Why it matters

Author @beaverd (2026-06-20) reports GLM 5.2 runs locally for free and “doesn't actively sandbag you,” implying fewer safety/guardrail refusals than alternatives.

Key details

  • They contrast GLM 5.2 with Opus, claiming Opus repeatedly failed to follow explicit, multi-step instructions for protein behavior wiring while GLM completed the task without failure.
Source evidence

GLM 5.2 has been a dream. Running it locally for free and it doesn't actively sandbag you

I'd walk opus through every step of protein behavior, give it explicit instructions to wire it into the engine and it would completely fail.

GLM does it no problem, no sandbag.