Court rules against Trump EPA’s freeze of $20B in ‘green bank’ funds
On Aug. 4, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (divided decision) ruled the EPA acted improperly when it moved in March 2025 to freeze $20 billion in Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) grants; the agency has days to seek Supreme Court review.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled in early August 2026 that EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin improperly terminated grants under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), reversing the agency’s March 2025 freeze of $20 billion created by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. The ruling protects grantees such as Climate United (awarded $7 billion) that had already committed hundreds of millions to specific projects — university solar, California electric-truck financing, building-retrofit programs, and Native-led clean-energy work — though only a fraction of those funds were disbursed and grantees report staffing losses. The decision follows a patchwork of lower-court outcomes (district court favoring grantees in April 2025, a 2–1 three-judge panel for EPA in Sept. 2025) and leaves open a likely Supreme Court appeal. The ruling arrives amid broader litigation over a separate $7 billion Solar for All termination and other EPA attempts to unwind Biden-era climate financing.
The GGRF was created by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act; Climate United — a consortium awarded $7 billion of those GGRF funds (partners include Calvert Impact, Community Preservation Corp., and Self-Help) — had committed hundreds of millions to solar at the University of Arkansas, EV truck financing in California, building-efficiency upgrades, and tribal projects, but only a fraction of funds were disbursed.Open reader